Judgement and Forgiveness (part 2) – Examining Measure

The main passage within the synoptics that agree with one another is the passage on the measure one gives (Mt 7:2, Mk 4:24, Lk 6:38). One could rightly ask what Christ means by “measure” here; measure of what? This is adeptly answered by many Church Fathers and some more modern scholars. 

In his commentary on Matthew’s Gospel, St. Augustine provides us with an answer: “I think that by the word, measure, judgment itself is meant.”1 Augustine explains his thoughts further by saying “this expression has been used because the very rashness by which you punish another will inevitably punish yourself”.2 This is further clarified in the following summation, “according to the measure, by which thou judgest others, so shalt thou be judged thyself. If thou shalt show thyself kindly, then will others judge thee kindly: if thou judgest severely, then severely will others judge thee.”3 We as well read in the Catena Aurea of St. Thomas Aquinas Pseudo-Jerome’s commentary from Mark’s account, “according to the measure of his faith the understanding of mysteries is divided to every man, and the virtues of knowledge will also be added to them.”4 Here we see how Mark’s account of this part of the sermon reflects a theological notion. In the passages previous, Mark provides us with Christ’s question of where a candle is best placed and how nothing is hidden to the light, for nothing is hidden to God. While this is reflective of the omnipotence of God, the light may also represent our faith, for with faith we are lights for the world (Mt. 5:14), and so according to our faith we will obtain an understanding and knowledge of God. 

Finally, within the commentary on Luke we receive a greater abundance of fruit from the Fathers. We see St. Basil say “the same measure with which each one of you metes, that is, in doing good works or sinning, will he receive reward or punishment.”5 Following St. Basil we read from Cyril of Alexandria who helps to tie in from the Apostle Paul “he (Paul) says, he who sows sparingly, shall also reap sparingly (2 Cor. 6:9.) and he who sows blessings, shall reap also blessings… For a man is accepted in that which he has, not in that which he has not.”6

As we’ve seen, context seems to play a role in what meaning we gather from this phrase and thus the interpretation. In his commentary on Matthew’s Gospel, Rev. A.J Maas points out that “..some of the clauses and expressions of the present passage occur in other gospels in a quite different context, and consequently with a different meaning. The illustration of the sameness of measure, e.g., occurs Lk. 6:38 in an exhortation to liberality.”7 Within each of these distinct yet important contexts we can gather a deeper meaning of what Christ is saying to us. 

Through these interpretations we are able to grow closer to Christ as He is speaking directly to us in these texts. It is clear from these passages that the term “measure” can be applied to a broad range of topics and meanings depending on the context of the Gospel you choose. But “measure” equating to “judgement” is a definite understood meaning. Could Christ be calling us to a standard which we should live up to? In the following and final part to this series we will tackle the topic directly and come to an understanding of if we are to judge others and how we are to approach forgiveness.


1 St. Augustine, Commentary on the Sermon on the Mount, 172
2 St. Augustine, Commentary on the Sermon on the Mount, 172
3 Cornelius a Lapide, The Great Commentary – Matthew, trans. Thomas W Mossman (London: Hodges, 1887), chap. 7, at Catholics Online for the Third Millennium, https://www.ecatholic2000.com/index.php
4 St. Thomas Aquinas, Catena Aurea – Commentary on the Four Gospels Collected Out of the Works of the Fathers – Mark (London: Parker, J.G.F, and Rivington, 1841), chap 4: 21-25, at Catholics Online for the Third Millennium, https://www.ecatholic2000.com/index.php
5,6 St. Aquinas, Catena Aurea – Luke,chap. 6: 37-38
7 Maas, Commentary on Matthew, part 3

The Naturally Ordained Government?

In our day and age we’ve become accustomed to the thought of a polity or republic. Mainly as the creation of a “democratic government” was seen as breaking the shackles of being bound to one ruler, a kingly headship over a nation. This perceived freedom came with the promise of self-government for the good of all. If only the founders of this great thought understood just how fallen humanity was, and how the push for democracy was yet another order away from the structure God Himself ordained.

The very thought of a monarchy to most is very troublesome, but when most think of the idea the first thought that enters their mind is an evil tyrannical dictator, and who could possibly want that? Yet, the actual structure of the world, the Church God founded, and even heaven itself is hierarchical; how could this be (especially when monarchs are evil tyrannical dictators)? Isn’t self-government, where each person has their own say, a better way to live? … doubtful

As stated, we firstly experience a hierarchy in nature, among created things. We can see this structure stemming from the smallest hylomorphic being to the rational animal (humans) and even beyond to the angels. Each of these levels have degrees to which they can be perfected but eventually a chasm occurs between the lower and higher levels. We as well read in scripture that the angels themselves are arranged in a hierarchy in heaven. Ordained by God, created as a reflection.

Secondly, the Church Christ founded while on earth is structured as a hierarchy. Ranging from the lay faithful all the way up to the Pope and the ever guided magisterium. The Pope representing Christ’s headship over His body, but Christ Himself always being King of heaven and earth.

Now that we’ve come to see that God ordained and arranged all that He has created as a hierarchy, we can ask, is Monarchical rule really the preference? For this we must ask… what is the ultimate purpose of a government?

A government serves the citizenry fundamentally by preserving unity, peace, and the common good. The better a structure of government can serve these functions the better it is, objectively. As St. Thomas states in De Regno Chapter 3:

“…whatever is in accord with nature is best, for in all things nature does what is best. Now, every natural governance is governance by one. In the multitude of bodily members there is one which is the principal mover, namely, the heart; and among the powers of the soul one power presides as chief, namely, the reason… and in the whole universe there is One God, Maker and Ruler of all things. And there is a reason for this. Every multitude is derived from unity”

A government that stands against itself will surely crumble, but in a government of one there is only unity. Peace and justice can more assuredly be attained. And when one loves his country, as a ruler should, the common good is sought more fruitfully.

A government by many only breeds distrust, disunity, and selfishness. This is especially true when we not only break the shackles of the old way of government but the very fundamental understanding of human nature and our final end. How can we expect to be “ruled by the people” when the people cannot rule themselves to begin with. Just as has happened time and time again throughout the history of creation we’ve left God behind, disobeyed His commands, and have sought to make ourselves like Him. A government dependent upon self-rule, especially when removed from virtue in the light of revelation and reason, is nothing but the same sweet words of the serpent in the garden, “you shall be like gods.”


The words of St. Thomas ring true even to this day. Creation tends towards what is natural… Since hierarchy is naturally ordained with a King presiding, we tend towards this ideal no matter how much we struggle. For an example we need look no further then the trial republic of our United States of America. What began as a democracy (of sorts) has in recent decades become an oligarchy (the negative side of a government ruled by the wealthy class, entire generations of families rooted in government with no connection to their citizens), and now we see that the oligarchy must have a single head, one that can be controlled and manipulated, but a head none the less. Except when you have a king thrust upon you by the aristocrats instead of by God or the Church you are left with nothing other then a tyrant.

St. Thomas Aquinas, angelic doctor of God’s Holy Catholic Church, ora pro nobis

Judgement and Forgiveness (part 1) – peering into the sermon on the mount


In modern times the understanding of judgement and forgiveness that Christ gave us (Mt 7:1-5, Mk 4:24-25, Lk 6:37-38, 41-42), has seemingly been lost and is most certainly vague, if not misunderstood. When examining this topic, a deeper look at these scripture passages themselves is where we should go; especially in an attempt to return to a proper understanding of Christ’s call and command. What is meant by “Judge not”? And how should we approach forgiveness?

It is firstly proper to briefly account that this pericope is taking place towards the end of Our Lord’s sermon on the mount. During this sermon Christ is presenting us with “a perfect standard of the Christian life: and this we do not rashly venture to promise, but gather it from the very words of the Lord Himself”1 It is being given on a mountain as Christ is presenting us with “higher precepts of justice,”2 and He is sitting, “the expression of the plenary authority of the teacher.. the cathedra or chair.”3 To supplement the thoughts of St. Augustine above we read from the commentary by Rev. A.J Maas:

He (Christ) sits down, after the manner of the Jewish teachers, in a spot that commands the whole plateau; his twelve surround him immediately; then come the disciples, and around them the vast multitude forms an enclosing circle. It is therefore not necessary to distinguish between a discourse delivered on the mountain to the disciples [Mt.] and another delivered on the plain to the multitudes [Lk. cf. Aug.] … the discourse as related by the first evangelist was not addressed to the disciples alone is evident from 7:28; and similarly, the discourse contained in the third gospel [Lk. 6:20 ff.] was not addressed to the multitudes alone, because our Lord began to speak, “lifting up his eyes on his disciples.”4

Furthermore, “Jesus does not so much legislate as he provides the disciples with a new understanding of God that, if followed, will radically change and transform their lives… the truth of what he teaches can only be known by those who put it into practice.”5

The point that is clear and attributable to the pericope we seek to examine is that Christ is trying to present us with not only a new way of thinking, but a new way of living. “The lofty ethics that are expressed here will continue to astonish people.. and impress them as the height of moral greatness.”6  Divine Justice is presented to us within the passages of this pericope in a way that we too can partake in. If we live according to the principles Christ gives us, we can more fully experience the life God wills for us, and thus follow the command of Christ to “be perfect as your heavenly Father is perfect” (Mt 5:48).

In the articles to follow we will dive deeper into Christ’s words, engaging the passage that we find throughout each of the Gospels and finally closing on the fundamental understanding of what is meant when we are told to “judge not” and how we should approach forgiveness.


1 St. Augustine, Commentary on the Lord’s Sermon on the Mount with Seventeen related Sermons, trans. Denis J Kavanagh (Washington DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1951), 19
2 St. Augustine, Commentary on the Sermon on the Mount, 20
3 Joseph Ratzinger, Jesus of Nazareth – From the Baptism in the Jordan to the Transfiguration, trans. Adrian J Walker (New York: Doubleday, 2007), 65
4 Rev. A.J Mass SJ, The Gospel According To Saint Matthew With An Explanatory And Critical Commentary (Missouri: Herder, 1898), part 3, at Catholics Online for the Third Millennium, https://www.ecatholic2000.com/index.php
5 Rev. Frank Matera, The Sermon on the Mount: The Perfect Measure of the Christian Life (Minnesota: Liturgical Press, 2013), 60
6 Ratzinger, Jesus of Nazareth, 123

Reality and Ideas – adequatio rei et intellectus

Epistemology is the science and study of how we know, and is incredibly important to form the correct foundations for the remainder of philosophy and more importantly, theology. How we think influences how we act and, how we come to a knowledge of God. It is important to understand where knowledge comes from and how it is truly pursued thus William Wallace writes in The Elements of Philosophy “man does not first know knowledge, he first knows things. It is only in one’s reflective awareness of the knowing process that he can know what it is to know1

In order to more clearly see the importance of there being objectivity in thought we must look at the different schools pertaining to the development of this science and their views of how we know. The first school of thought are the materialists; this school reflects those who think that all of reality is merely material and can be explained through sense knowledge alone. In other words how these “philosophers” think we come to knowledge exists entirely in the material world.

At the opposite side of the schools lay the spiritualists; these philosophers, Plato being prominent among them, understand there to be non-material existence and reality but they deny the importance of the material realm for coming to knowledge. Plato believed in the existence of the soul, but rejected the importance of the body. Expounding further on his understanding he as well believed knowledge to already exist within the soul, but when trapped inside the body needed to remember what it already knew. Thus, in the view of the spiritualists, all knowledge already exists within a soul but needs to be drawn out of it.

The final, third school of thought is known as Aristotelianism; which believes knowledge to be both spiritual and material. This school sees the mind as a blank slate, ideas enter the mind primarily through our senses as they experience the objective world around us, finally culminating into further actions of the mind. For Aristotle, knowledge begins in the senses but ends in the mind; thus, having both a material and spiritual characteristic.

In order to follow the perennial philosophy of the ages Pope Leo XIII exhorts in his encyclical Aeterni Patris

“While, therefore, We hold that every word of wisdom, every useful thing by whomsoever discovered or planned, ought to be received with a willing and grateful mind, We exhort you, venerable brethren, in all earnestness to restore the golden wisdom of St. Thomas, and to spread it far and wide for the defense and beauty of the Catholic faith, for the good of society, and for the advantage of all the sciences.”2

As St. Thomas took from the patrimony of Aristotle we too see through it that because knowledge begins in our senses but ends perfected in the mind, truth itself can be described as the adequation of the mind to a thing. Because that which is experienced by our senses can lead to truth, when our senses experience something there must be a reality presenting itself to us. But truth in this sense is still imperfect and fallible. Truth is fully and substantially found only in the second act of the mind, the judgement. In order to know a thing completely you must be able to establish a relationship between the thing and that which it is not. These relationships made in judgement bring about a unity of knowledge and when it is in conformity with the actual unity of the object the mind attains truth. 

Our minds are made to know truth and this is recognized by our ability to form universal ideas, beginning through our sense experience, and ending in our mind. Because knowledge and truth are the conformity of our intellect to the object perceived, if our senses are not hindered in some way, truth is an objective, attainable reality. Since there are objective ideas in reality, there must also be objective ideas about God, which are primarily found in the theology of the Catholic Church. A theology which “signifies the noblest part and the true summit of philosophical discourse… which now is the reflection undertaken by the believer in order to express the true doctrine about God.”3 With a proper understanding, following perennial teaching, of the science of epistemology we can know the presence of objective ideas and thus come to a deeper understanding of the reality outside of the mere material; which can primarily be found within the theology of the Catholic Church.


1William Wallace OP, The Elements of Philosophy, Ltd ed. (Oregon: Wipf and Stock, 2011), 110
2Pope Leo XIII, Encyclical On The Restoration of Christian Philosophy Aeterni Patris (04 Aug 1879), §31
3 Pope John Paull II, Encyclical Letter on the Relationship Between Faith and Reason Fides et Ratio (14 September 1998), §39

More than the Moral Minimum – Foundations in Ethical Action

As we’ve stated previously, the fundamental principle in Ethics is as follows: “good is to be done and evil is to be avoided.” Thus our first instinct when met with a difficult choice should be to follow this foundational principle. But how can we assure an act is good, and aren’t there times we can cooperate with an evil?

True Knowledge of a Good Act

There are three key aspects that go into ensuring an act is morally good or evil –
1) The object of the act
2) the intention of the moral agent
3) the circumstances associated with the situation

These three rules help to guide us; if any one of these rules is evil (wrong) then we cannot pursue the act (at least in its current form). Only when the object of the act is good, the intention is aimed appropriately, and the circumstances allow it can an act be deemed a “morally good act” (though the circumstances only modify the moral quality of it). For example, if one is to give money to the poor. The object of the act (giving money to those in need) is an objectively good thing, but say you were intending to do it to feel good about yourself or to gloat to your friends. Well, while the object of the act is good, your intention (the end, or reason for which you act) is wrong and therefore while it might have been a good thing to give the poor money, your act was morally corrupt, as you were doing it for an evil reason. 

As I mentioned, circumstances qualify an action; they adjust the moral character or affect the subjective guilt. While circumstances only qualify an action, we must always remember that a good action, with good intentions, still depends on the circumstances to truly be good. Using the same example as above; if you gave money to a poor man with the good intention of helping him for the sake of charity, but the money you used, you stole. The object and intention are noble (and wouldn’t be wrong in themselves) but the circumstance of stolen money still makes it a morally bad act. 

Why discuss whether an act is good or bad to begin with? In order to fully grasp the first principle in Ethics we must as well understand what it means to act in moral goodness and to avoid evil. Every action we make as rational beings is a moral action precisely because of our rational nature. We are able to freely choose good, to decipher the qualities surrounding an act and will the proper end. 

Cooperating with Evil?

Now that we’ve refreshed our memory on the fundamental principle in Ethics and have discussed acting as moral agents, what’s with this talk about cooperating with evil, especially following our discussion about whether we can perform an act or not based on its moral character?

-In order to examine this idea properly we must also understand another ethical principle, namely Double Effect. This principle states (put simply) that you can still perform an action that is associated with an evil effect of some kind as long as the evil itself is not the object of the act or the intention but is involved in the circumstances. As well there must be sufficiently/proportionately grave reason for permitting the evil.-

Now that we have obtained a glimpse at double effect we can understand that while there are times we can cooperate with evil, the evil must never be a part of the object or intention of the act and can only come from it (or in other words the good cannot come from the evil, but the good must happen and at the same time or immediately following the evil then happens) 

The verdict?

While we have seen that we can cooperate with evil (in very qualified circumstances) do we have to? The simple answer is, no. We never have to cooperate with evil, especially following the first principle in Ethics. Every action we make should be guided first and foremost to do good and avoid evil. Even the principle of double effect is led by this foundation. Anything associated with evil we should desire wholly to turn away from and remember to always turn to the source of infinite Goodness, God.


In very recent times it seems we’ve forgotten that in the face of great evil, or even one that is allowed on the basis of double effect, we don’t have to cooperate with it — 

Take the higher moral road, where radical saintly virtue is found

We shouldn’t be content with only doing the moral minimum, God is always calling us to live a life in Him, the fullness of Truth. The life of a saint is filled with much trial and tribulation, but it is only to further perfect us in virtue to make us more like Christ who suffered for our sake just the same. Follow Christ, choose your hill, carry your cross to the top, and die on it next to Him for His sake. 

A reflection on the fruits of the death of Jesus Christ

An excerpt from the “The Passion of Jesus Christ” by St. Alphonsus de Liguori, part 1:4

“St. John writes that our Savior, in order to make his disciples understand the death

he was to suffer upon the cross, said, And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will

draw all things to Myself. Now this he said, signifying what death he should die.2

And, in fact, by exhibiting himself crucified and dead, how many souls has Jesus

drawn to himself, so that they have left all to give themselves up entirely to his

divine love. Ah, my Jesus! draw my soul to Yourself, which was one time lost;

draw it by the chains of Your love, so that it may forget the world to think of

nothing else but of loving and pleasing You. Draw me after You by the odor of Your

Ointments.3

My Lord, You know my weakness and the offences that I have committed against

You. Draw me out of the mire of my passions; draw all my affections to Yourself,

so that I may attend to nothing but Your pleasure only, O my God, most lovely!

Hear me, O Lord! by the merits of Your death, and make me wholly Yours.

St. Leo tells us that he who looks with confidence upon Jesus dead upon the

cross is healed of the wounds caused by his sins. “They who with faith behold the

death of Christ are healed from the wounds of sin.”4 Every Christian, therefore,

should keep Jesus crucified always before his eyes, and say with St. Paul, I judged

not myself to know anything among you, but Jesus Christ, and Him crucified.5 In

short, the Apostle says, that he did not desire any other knowledge in this world

than that of knowing how to love Jesus Christ crucified. My beloved Savior, to

obtain for me a good death You have chosen a death so full of pain and desolation!

The Crucifixion

I cast myself into the arms of Your mercy. I see that many years ago I ought to have

been in hell, separated from You forever, for having at one time despised Your

grace; but You have called me to penance, and I hope have pardoned me; but if

through my fault You have not yet pardoned me, pardon me at this moment. I

repent, O my Jesus! with my heart, for having turned my back upon You, and

driven You from my soul. Restore me to Your grace. But that is not enough: give

me strength to love You with all my soul during my whole life. And when I come to

the hour of my death, let me expire burning with love for You, and saying, my

Jesus, I love You, I love You, and thus continue to love You for all eternity. From

this moment I unite my death to Your holy death, through which I hope for my

salvation. In You, O Lord, have I hoped; I shall not be confounded forever.6

O great mother of God, you after Jesus are my hope. In you, O Lady, have I hoped;

I shall not be confounded forever. O devout souls, when the devil wishes to

make us distrustful about our salvation by the remembrance of our past sins, let us

lift up our eyes to Jesus dead upon the cross, in order to deliver us from eternal

death. After a God has made us know by means of the holy faith the desires he has

of our salvation, having even sacrificed his life for us, if we are resolved really to

love him for the remainder of our lives, cost what it may, we should be on our

guard against any weakness of confidence in his mercy. After he has given us so

many signs of his love for us, and of his desire for our salvation, it is a kind of sin

against him not to put our whole confidence and hope in his goodness.

Full, then, of holy confidence, let us hope for every good from the hands of a God

so liberal and so loving; and at the same time let us give ourselves to him without

reserve, and thus pray to him: O eternal God, we are sinners, but You who are

Almighty can make us saints; grant that henceforth we may neglect nothing that we

know to be for Your glory, and may do all to please You. Blessed shall we be if we

lose all to gain You, the infinite good. Grant that we may spend the remainder of

our lives in pleasing You alone. Punish us as You will for our past sins, but deliver

us from the chastisement of not being able to love You; deprive us of all things save

Yourself. You have loved us without reserve; we also will love You without reserve,

O infinite Love, O infinite Good. O Virgin Mary, draw us wholly to God; you can

do so; do so for the love that you have for Jesus Christ.”

1 Love of God, Bk. 7. ch. 8.

2 “Et ego si exaltatus fuero a terra, omnia traham ad meipsum.” John 12.32.

3 “Trahe me post te in odorem unguentorum tuorum.” (Cf. Song 1.3)

4 “Qui intuentur fide mortem Christi, sanantur a morsibus peccatorum.” In Jo. tr. 12.

5 “Non enim judicavi me scire aliquid inter vos, nisi Jesum Christum, et hunc crucifixum.” 1 Cor. 2.2.

6 “In te, Domine, speravi; non confundar in aeternum.” Ps. 30.2.

Lenten Supplication – prayer during the first week

(Taken from The Liturgical Year by Dom Guéranger – Tuesday of the first week of Lent; originally found in the Mozarabic missal)

“Have pity on us, O most merciful Lord, and spare thy people;

For we have sinned against thee.

We all prostrate before thee, and pour out our tears: we confess unto thee our hidden sins, and beseech thee, God, to pardon us.

For we have sinned against thee.

Receive the prayers of thy priests, and abundantly grant what they ask : and have mercy on thy people, Lord.

For we have sinned against thee.

Thou art angry against us: our heinous crimes have bowed us down to the earth: and we have grown faint, because there is no hope within us.

For we have sinned against thee.

We have been made a prey to evils that we know not, and every evil has come upon us: we have called upon thee, and we have heard no reply.

For we have sinned against thee.

We all cry unto thee: we all seek thee: we are repentant, and weeping follow thee, for we have provoked thy anger.

For we have sinned against thee.

We beseech thee, we sigh out our prayers to thee: O Jesus, we prostrate before thee, and petition thee: let thy power raise us from our misery.

For we have sinned against thee.

Receive thy people’s confession: full of sorrow, we pour it out before thee: and our hearts are sad for the sins we have committed.

For we have sinned against thee.

We sue for peace; grant I us peace! Avert the scourge of war, and deliver us, we humbly beseech thee, Lord!

For we have sinned against thee.

Bow down thine ear, O most merciful God! Cleanse us from the stains of our sins, and, in thy pity, deliver us from all dangers.

Have mercy on us and spare”

The Practice of Prayer

I recently led a talk on prayer from the lens of St. Teresa of Avila, the Doctor of the Church on Prayer. Below are my notes from the talk.

Where does our understanding come from?

St. Teresa of Avila (or *of Jesus) was a Carmelite Nun and a Doctor of The Church on Prayer.

She has 3 notable works that helped develop her teaching on prayer, The first is “The Life,” an autobiography of her life, specifically, (written more for her spiritual directors/confessors at the time so they could gain insight into her background to help her grow), but it also gives us insight into her understanding of prayer and the depth at which she was able to penetrate, she was 47 years old when she began writing this.

The second is entitled “The Way to Perfection,” which was written for her Carmelite sisters to help them further understand the beginning stages of prayer.
The final work, which is more spoken about, is called “The Interior Castle” or “The Mansions.” which was written in 1577, 5 years prior to her death. This book dives deeper into the final levels of prayer, as it was 20 years after her first work, her understanding and devotion to prayer was much deeper.
All of these works helped shape our understanding of prayer with which there are 10 total levels, 9 of which are achievable on earth and the 10th being only which we can do in Heaven.

Her work “The Life” is pretty comparable to St. Augustine’s “Confessions.” She writes about her life before her true conversion to Christ and what she now knows and understands having reflected on it. St. Teresa of Avila suffered numerous infirmities during her life, and all of this adds to her insight into prayer. If you truly want to be humbled and see a Saint through a Saints eyes, I recommend this book.

She gives the greatest and clearest accounts on prayer and all 3 of her works helped shape what is now The Church’s teaching. As you read from her first to her last work, you can tell how much she has grown to understand prayer. Much of the first book, while still speaking on the levels of prayer, isn’t quite clear on the distinctions between them. I will be utilizing all her works in conjunction to give us a greater fullness. Now that we have the basis for where our understanding comes from let’s move into the what of the matter.

What are the levels of prayer according to St. Teresa and thus, The Church?

(Lowest) Vocal prayer
Meditation
Affective Mental prayer
Acquired Recollection
Infused Recollection
Prayer of Quiet
Prayer of Simple Union
Prayer of Ecstatic Union
Prayer of Transforming Union (Highest)

How do we reach these levels and what does each entail?

As previously stated, her work “The Life” while focusing on her life, also gives great insight into the beginning stages of prayer. In this book St. Teresa uses an analogy of a gardener watering his garden to explain these stages of prayer, her books that came after help to build and distinguish these stages more deeply.

She writes in Chapter 11 of “The Life”: “Let us now consider how this garden can be watered, so that we may know what we have to do, what labour it will cost us, if the gain will outweigh the labour and for how long this labour must be borne. It seems to me that the garden can be watered in four ways:

1) by taking the water physically from a well, which costs us great labour;
2) by a water-wheel and buckets, when the water is drawn by a windlass (I have sometimes drawn it in this way: it is less laborious than the other and gives more water)
3) by a stream or a brook, which waters the ground much better, for it saturates it more thoroughly and there is less need to water it often, so that the gardener’s labour is much less
4) by heavy rain, when the Lord waters it with no labour of ours, a way incomparably better than any of those which have been described.”

Notice how St. Teresa mentions “the labor of the gardener” and how much he will have to labor at each stage. The first stages of watering the garden take the gardener much more labor that the final ones. Thus we see that the higher we ascend in prayer the less work we do and the more we rely on God.

The 1st way of watering the garden reflects the first 2 levels of prayer, which we have come to know as Vocal prayer and Meditation. During these two stages, we are fully engaging our faculties, at great laborious cost to us, but we receive what we receive through our own effort (and by God’s great mercy).

St Teresa continues in chapter 11, “Beginners in prayer, we may say, are those who draw up the water out of the well: this, as I have said, is a very laborious proceeding, for it will fatigue them to keep their senses recollected, which is a great labour because they have been accustomed to a life of distraction. Beginners must accustom themselves to pay no heed to what they see or hear, and they must practice doing this during hours of prayer; they must be alone and in their solitude think over their past life — all of us, indeed, whether beginners or proficients, must do this frequently.”

This is supplemented in her writing “The way to perfection” where in chapter 22 she writes “You must know, daughters, that whether or not you are practicing mental prayer has nothing to do with keeping the lips closed. If, while I am speaking with God, I have a clear realization and full consciousness that I am doing so, and if this is more real to me than the words I am uttering, then I am combining mental and vocal prayer. When people tell you that you are speaking with God by reciting the Paternoster and thinking of worldly things—well, words fail me. When you speak, as it is right for you to do, with so great a Lord, it is well that you should think of Who it is that you are addressing, and what you yourself are, if only that you may speak to Him with proper respect… Who can say that it is wrong if, before we begin reciting the Hours or the Rosary, we think Whom we are going to address, and who we are that are addressing Him, so that we may do so in the way we should? I assure you, sisters, that if you gave all due attention to a consideration of these two points before beginning the vocal prayers which you are about to say you would be engaging in mental prayer for a very long time. For we cannot approach a prince and address him in the same careless way that we should adopt in speaking to a peasant or to some poor woman like ourselves, whom we may address however we like.”

Notice how much emphasis she places on being attentive to what you are saying and how devoted you are while saying it. Thus both vocal and mental prayer go hand in hand for the Church practices vocal prayer throughout the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass yet every word holds distinct meaning. We must understand and be attentive with that which we are praying, for it to merit anything. To understand these truths we must look inward. And as we ascend further into the stages of prayer, it all looks more and more inward.

But in Chapter 12 of “The Life” St. Teresa warns us of trying to force our way into the next levels of prayer, here she says “..it is very important that we should not try to lift up our spirits unless they are lifted up by the Lord.”

For beginners in prayer it is important to become proficient in the first two to three stages of prayer for the next are formed through this very habit. The devil can easily manipulate sensations and feelings if we begin to ascend too quickly.

In Chapter 14 St. Teresa goes into the next stage of watering the garden. She writes “This state, in which the soul begins to recollect itself, borders on the supernatural, to which it could in no way attain by its own exertions. True, it sometimes seems to have been wearied by its work at the windlass — its labouring with the understanding and its filling of the buckets; but in this state the water is higher and thus much less labour is required than for the drawing of it from the well. I mean that the water is nearer to it, for grace reveals itself to the soul more clearly. This state is a recollecting of the faculties within the soul, so that its fruition of that contentment may be of greater delight. But the faculties are not lost, nor do they sleep. The will alone is occupied, in such a way that, without knowing how, it becomes captive. It allows itself to be imprisoned by God, as one who well knows itself to be the captive of Him Whom it loves”

This stage of watering the garden contains what we have come to understand as Affective mental prayer and Acquired recollection. In Affective mental prayer we come to pray out of complete love of God. We pray to Him who is Lord of our soul.

To explain the stage of Acquired recollection St. Teresa says.. “This quiet and recollectedness in the soul makes itself felt largely through the satisfaction and peace which it brings to it, together with a very great joy and repose of the faculties and a most sweet delight. As the soul has never gone beyond this stage, it thinks there is no more left for it to desire and, like Saint Peter, it wishes that it could make its abode here.It dares not move or stir, for it thinks that if it does so this blessing may slip from its grasp: sometimes it would like to be unable even to breathe.”

Notice how she mentions this quiet of the soul and the peace with which this stage brings. It is most easily understood (for me at least) through the adoring of the Most Blessed Sacrament. Your faculties are captivated by Our Lord, but this is only accomplished by someone who has control over his faculties. Acquired recollection is exactly that, “Acquired,” because it is still something we have to work for. This is the last stage of what man can achieve on his own.

To further supplement this stage and to build on what St. Augustine said, “neither in market places nor in pleasures nor wheresoever else I sought Him did I find Him as I did within myself.”

St. Teresa writes in “The way to perfection”…  “All I want is that we should know and abide with the Person with Whom we are speaking, and not turn our backs upon Him; for that, it seems to me, is what we are doing when we talk to God and yet think of all kinds of vanity. The whole mischief comes from our not really grasping the fact that He is near us, and imagining Him far away—so far, that we shall have to go to Heaven in order to find Him. How is it, Lord, that we do not look at Thy face, when it is so near us?”

We now move on to Chapter 16 of “The Life” and to the 3rd way of watering the garden… “–that is, of running water proceeding from a river or a spring. This irrigates the garden with much less trouble, although a certain amount (of labor) is needed for the directing of it. But the Lord is now pleased to help the gardener, so that He may almost be said to be the gardener Himself, for it is He (God) Who does everything.”

This way of watering brings us into the next 2 levels of prayer. This stage moves us into the mystical, where we cannot enter but by God alone. The distinction between these two stages, namely Infused Recollection (the next step from Acquired Recollection) and the Prayer of Quiet is more strongly shown in St. Teresa’s final work where she writes about Infused Recollection more specifically saying “My own experience of this delight and sweetness in meditation was that when I began to weep over the Passion I could not stop until I had a severe headache; the same thing occurred when I grieved over my sins: this was a great grace from our Lord.”

This paragraph goes to explain a deeper distinction between Acquired and Infused recollection. It also helps to separate Infused recollection from the Prayer of Quiet, which she had more trouble doing in her early years (this could have been because she skipped certain stages).

St. Teresa describes the Prayer of Quiet, quite vividly in “The Life” where she says in Chapter 16 “This state is a sleep of the faculties, which are neither wholly lost nor yet can understand how they work… The faculties retain only the power of occupying themselves wholly with God; not one of them, it seems, ventures to stir, nor can we cause any of them to move except by trying to fix our attention very carefully on something else, and even then I do not think we could entirely succeed in doing so. Many words are spoken, during this state, in praise of God, but, unless the Lord Himself puts order into them, they have no orderly form. The understanding, at any rate, counts for nothing here; the soul would like to shout praises aloud, for it is in such a state that it cannot contain itself — a state of delectable disquiet.”

The Prayer of Quiet is the stage before what St. Teresa calls “The prayers of Union.” The Prayer of Quiet is the culmination of conjunction between our earthly life and the spiritual. She writes in Chapter 31 in “The Way to Perfection”… “It is a great favour which the Lord grants to these souls, for it unites the active life with the contemplative. At such times they serve the Lord in both these ways at once; the will, while in contemplation, is working without knowing how it does so; the other two faculties are serving Him as Martha did. Thus Martha and Mary work together.

In this level we are completely captivated by the Divine Presence. God moves our soul, God moves our Will. He is our focus, our joy, our wholeness. When God Himself desires, He will move us from this level to the next level of prayer, as mentioned, “The Prayer of Union.”

There are various degrees of this prayer as mentioned in the beginning, Simple, Ecstatic, and Transforming.

As we approach St. Teresa’s teaching on these final degrees of prayer. She begins in Chapter 18 of “The Life” by trying to describe these heights of mystical prayer, explaining it from the lens of ascent of the former levels in which she writes… “In the whole of the prayer already described, and in each of its stages, the gardener is responsible for part of the labour; although in these later stages the labour is accompanied by such bliss and consolation that the soul’s desire would be never to abandon it: the labour is felt to be, not labour at all, but bliss. In this state of prayer to which we have now come, there is no feeling, but only rejoicing, unaccompanied by any understanding of the thing in which the soul is rejoicing. It realizes that it is rejoicing in some good thing, in which are comprised all good things at once, but it cannot comprehend this good thing. In this rejoicing all the senses are occupied, so that none of them is free or able to act in any way, either outwardly or inwardly”

She then continues further down with the final way of watering the garden. “Speaking now of this rain which comes from Heaven to fill and saturate the whole of this garden with an abundance of water, we can see how much rest the gardener would be able to have if the Lord never ceased to send it whenever it was necessary. And if there were no winter, but eternal warm weather, there would never be a death of flowers and fruit and we can imagine how delighted he would be. But during this life, that is impossible, and, when one kind of water fails, we must always be thinking about obtaining another. This rain from Heaven often comes when the gardener is least expecting it. Yet it is true that at first it almost always comes after long mental prayer: as one degree of prayer succeeds another, the Lord takes this little bird and puts it into the nest where it may repose. Having watched it flying for a long time, striving with mind and will and all its strength to seek and please God, it becomes His pleasure, while it is still in this life, to give it its reward. And what a great reward that is! For even a moment of it suffices to recompense the soul for all the trials that it can possibly have endured.”

St. Teresa more accurately depicts these final levels of prayer in “The Interior Castle,” where they begin in the Fifth Mansion… as the prayers of union are the heights of mystical prayer it is only fitting that St. Teresa start as she does in Chapter 1 of the Fifth Mansion…“OH, my sisters, how shall I describe the riches, treasures, and joys contained in the fifth mansions! Would it not be better to say nothing about them? They are impossible to depict, nor can the mind conceive, nor any comparisons portray them, all earthly things being too vile to serve the purpose. Send me, O my Lord, light from heaven that I may give some to these Thy servants, some of whom by Thy good will often enjoy these delights, lest the devil in the guise of an angel of light should deceive those whose only desire is to please Thee…  I dare venture to assert that, if this is genuine union with God, the devil cannot interfere nor do any harm, for His Majesty is so joined and united with the essence of the soul, that the evil one dare not approach, nor can he even understand this mystery.”

She continues later in Chapter 1 about the signs of the first degree of this level saying “Let us now speak of the sign which proves the prayer of union to have been genuine. As you have seen, God then deprives the soul of all its senses that He may the better imprint in it true wisdom: it neither sees, hears, nor understands anything while this state lasts, which is never more than a very brief time;it appears to the soul to be much shorter than it really is. God visits the soul in a manner which prevents its doubting, on returning to itself, that it dwelt in Him and that He was within it, and so firmly is it convinced of this truth that, although years may pass before this favour recurs, the soul can never forget it nor doubt the fact,setting aside the effects left by this prayer, to which I will refer later on. The conviction felt by the soul is the main point.”

As we read, the Prayer of Simple Union is just that. It is a state only God can bring upon us, in which He enters the soul, wholly, filling it with only Himself. How simple a gift this is, yet it is the most powerful moment we would have yet experienced. The very essence of Christian life is dedicated to seeing the face of God in Heaven, and yet, in this stage God comes to us and seeks a union of our soul with Him.

Moving on to the Prayer of Ecstatic Union, this level has also been known as “spiritual betrothal.” Having experienced God Himself entering wholly into the soul, it wishes nothing more than God from then on. This is more clearly explained in Chapter 1 of the 6th Mansion by St. Teresa where she says “…the soul, wounded with love for its Spouse, sighs more than ever for solitude, withdrawing as far as the duties of its state permit from all that can interrupt it, The sight it has enjoyed of Him is so deeply imprinted on the spirit that its only desire is to behold Him again.” end quote; But God in His infinite Love and desire for us in our entirety does not give us this so easily, she continues in chapter 1… “The soul is now determined to take no other Bridegroom than our Lord, but He disregards its desires for its speedy espousals, wishing that these longings should become still more vehement and that this good, which far excels all other benefits, should be purchased at some cost to itself. And although for so great a gain all that we must endure is but a poor price to pay, I assure you, daughters, that this pledge of what is in store for us is needed to inspire us with courage to bear our crosses.”

As such this Prayer of Ecstatic Union is laid with trials and other mystical phenomena, all of this is to make it so that we continue to pursue God in His glory. Due to these factors with which coincide with this level of prayer St. Teresa writes 11 chapters about this 6th mansion, describing the trials and phenomena that one may experience while pursuing Our Creator.

As to not lose track of the ultimate goal of this paper, I will but name some of the things St. Teresa says one can experience in this level of prayer…

-Trials accompanying divine favors  
-Earthly outcries against one who has entered into this level. (ie.. friends leaving you, or the public lashing out against you for seemingly no reason; these are works of the great deceiver)
-The soul not desiring praise, even to the point of it causing one pain. (ie. commendation causes great suffering; this stems from a recognition of our fallenness and that anything good about us is God’s doing)
-Indifference to praise and blame
-A great love of enemies
-Bodily sufferings
-Anxiety from past sins
-Scruples and fears (also caused by the devil)
-Visions
-Flights of the spirit

Notice how many of these things can represent Christ’s cross to us. In this level of prayer God already has captivity of our will, but He is saying that we must accept and trust His way, by giving us the chance, however small, to follow Christ’s path to crucifixion.

If one bears their trials with great affection for our Lord, God grants them this next and final degree of the Prayer of Union. That which we know as the Prayer of Transforming union, is also known as “mystical marriage.” This enters us into the 7th mansion of the interior castle…

St. Teresa begins in Chapter 1 of this mansion… “You may think, sisters, that so much has been said of this spiritual journey that nothing remains to be added. That would be a great mistake: God’s immensity has no limits, neither have His works; therefore, who can recount His mercies and His greatness? It is impossible, so do not be amazed at what I write about them which is but a cipher of what remains untold concerning God. He has shown great mercy in communicating these mysteries to one who could recount them to us, for as we learn more of His intercourse with creatures, we ought to praise Him more fervently and to esteem more highly the soul in which He so delights. Each of us possesses a soul but we do not realize its value as made in the image of God, therefore we fail to understand the important secrets it contains.”

She continues… “When our Lord is pleased to take pity on the sufferings, both past and present, endured through her longing for Him by this soul which He has spiritually taken for His bride, He, before consummating the celestial marriage, brings her into this His mansion or presence chamber. This is the seventh Mansion, for as He has a dwelling-place in heaven, so has He in the soul, where none but He may abide and which may be termed a second heaven”

St. Teresa then describes what exactly this final level brings… she writes “By some mysterious manifestation of the truth, the three Persons of the most Blessed Trinity reveal themselves, preceded by an illumination which shines on the spirit like a most dazzling cloud of light. The three Persons are distinct from one another; a sublime knowledge is infused into the soul, imbuing it with a certainty of the truth that the Three are of one substance, power, and knowledge and are one God. Thus that which we hold as a doctrine of faith, the soul now, so to speak, understands by sight, though it beholds the Blessed Trinity neither by the eyes of the body nor of the soul, this being no imaginary vision. All the Three Persons here communicate Themselves to the soul, speak to it and make it understand the words of our Lord in the Gospel that He and the Father and the Holy Ghost will come and make their abode with the soul which loves Him and keeps His commandments.”

The first fruit of this final Prayer of Union is this…“she seems no longer to exist, nor does she wish to be of any account in anything—anything! unless she sees that she can advance, however little, the honour and glory of God, for which she would most willingly die.”

The soul’s one and only wish is to glorify God by any possible way it can, by our life. Nothing else matters to the soul.

The second fruit, she writes “… is a strong desire for suffering, though it does not disturb her peace as before because the fervent wish of such souls for the fulfilment of God’s will in them makes them acquiesce in all He does. If He would have her suffer, she is content; if not, she does not torment herself to death about it as she used to do. She feels a great interior joy when persecuted, and is far more peaceful than in the former state under such circumstances: she bears no grudge against her enemies, nor wishes them any ill. Indeed she has a special love for them, is deeply grieved at seeing them in trouble, and does all she can to relieve them, earnestly interceding with God on their behalf.”

She continues… “Such a soul, thoroughly detached from all things, wishes to be either always alone or occupied on what benefits the souls of others: she feels neither aridity nor any interior troubles, but a constant tender recollection of our Lord Whom she wishes to praise unceasingly.”

The Final insight into prayer by the Doctor herself

After discussing these fruits further she then moves into chapter 4 where she goes on to give a recollection of everything she has brought together…“if her mind is fixed on Him, as it ought to be, she must needs forget herself: all her thoughts are bent on how to please Him better and when and how she can show the love she bears Him… This is the end and aim of prayer, my daughters; this is the reason of the spiritual marriage whose children are always good works. Works are the unmistakable sign which shows these favours come from God, as I told you. It will do me little good to be deeply recollected when alone, making acts of the virtues, planning and promising to do wonders in God’s service, if afterwards, when occasion offers, I do just the opposite. I did wrong in saying, ‘It will do me little good,’ for all the time we spend with God does us great good. Though afterwards we may weakly fail to perform our good intentions, yet some time or other His Majesty will find a way for us to practise them although perhaps much to our regret. Thus when He sees a soul very cowardly, He often sends it some great affliction, much against its will, and brings it through this trial with profit to itself…”

She continues… “Do you know what it is to be truly spiritual? It is for men to make themselves the slaves of God—branded with His mark, which is the cross. Since they have given Him their freedom, He can sell them as slaves to the whole world, as He was, which would be doing them no wrong but the greatest favour. Unless you make up your minds to this, never expect to make much progress, for as I said humility is the foundation of the whole building and unless you are truly humble, our Lord, for your own sake, will never permit you to rear it very high lest it should fall to the ground… This, my sisters, is what I would have us strive for—to offer our petitions and to practice prayer, not for our own enjoyment but to gain strength to serve God. Let us seek no fresh path; we should lose ourselves in ways of ease. It would be a strange thing to fancy we should gain these graces by any other road than that by which Jesus and all His saints have gone before. Let us not dream of such a thing: believe me, both Martha and Mary must entertain our Lord and keep Him as their Guest, nor must they be so inhospitable as to offer Him no food. How can Mary do this while she sits at His feet, if her sister does not help her?”

She finishes this work on prayer with this second to last paragraph… “In short, my sisters, I will conclude with this advice; do not build towers without a foundation, for our Lord does not care so much for the importance of our works as for the love with which they are done. When we do all we can, His Majesty will enable us to do more every day. If we do not grow weary, but during the brief time this life lasts we give our Lord every sacrifice we can, both interior and exterior, His Majesty will unite them with that He offered to His Father for us on the Cross so that they may be worth the value given them by our love, however mean the works themselves may be.”

Imitating Christ in the Desert- A Lenten Reflection

Our Lenten journey has begun; a season of sacrifice, of discipline, and most importantly of reflecting on Christ’s time in the desert, being tempted. Lent is a season for these things so we can fully prepare ourselves for Christ’s path to Golgotha and His death on the hill, nailed to a cross. In our preparation during our First Sunday of Lent, The Church in Her wisdom gives us the gospel of Luke chapter 4:1-13.

In these verses we read about Christ being led into the desert by The Holy Spirit, a place devoid of most life. No forest to admire it’s audacity, no ocean to reflect on its immensity, nothing of the world that would help point someone to God’s great creation and to His eternal goodness. Christ was led there, to be tempted by the devil himself.

One thing I have missed until this year is the specificity of what Christ was tempted with and it’s correspondence with the fall of men and the angels.

The appeal to the will

“And the devil said to him: If thou be the Son of God, say to this stone that it be made bread.”

When we read this verse we tend to be drawn to the fact that Christ, as a man, was hungry from His forty day fast. Of course the devil would tempt the flesh in this way. But when we think of Christ as the new Adam, here to form and fulfill the final and everlasting covenant with humanity, this temptation brings us back to the Garden of Eden where Adam and Eve were tempted with the forbidden fruit. The great deceiver once more tempting the will of man.

Christ then responds to this temptation saying “it is written, that Man liveth not by bread alone, but by every word of God.” A fitting response with even deeper meaning. The fall of man was brought about by a rejection of God’s word, the consumption of the forbidden fruit, and thus humanity’s death. Christ, being the Logos, fulfills His mission and brings salvation back to humanity.

The appeal to pride

“And the devil led him into a high mountain, and shewed him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time; And he said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them. If thou therefore wilt adore before me, all shall be thine.”

After the appeal to the will and its connection to humanity’s fall. The devil then appeals to pride. Pride, the root of evil, it is what caused the fall of the angels, one third of the stars to fall. The devil himself was driven by pride to reject his God-given objective, and so with a man before him appeals to that very thing that drove his own demise.

“Jesus answering said to him: It is written: Thou shalt adore the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.” Christ’s response to this temptation leads us back to the very fall of the angels, just as the first brought us back to the fall of humanity. Christ echoes and strengthens the response of the Archangel Michael, “who is like unto God?” No created being is worthy of the same praise and adoration as the uncreated God. God the father, the everlasting God-head, creator of the Universe, is the only one worthy of all of our adoration.

The appeal to authority

“And he brought him to Jerusalem, and set him on a pinnacle of the temple, and he said to him: If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself from hence. For it is written, that He hath given his angels charge over thee, that they keep thee. And that in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest perhaps thou dash thy foot against a stone.”

The third temptation is of an even higher degree than the others. Christ’s Will was not swayed by the first, and He had no pride from which He could succumb to the second. The devil then appeals to God’s (and as such, Christ’s) authority over creation.

“And Jesus answering, said to him: It is said: Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.”

Christ enacts His authority, even over the devil, in saying this to Him. Within scripture this is one of the few times Christ shows His authority and His place in the Trinity. With this statement we see Christ saying that “I am Him.”

These three temptations in the desert hold great gravity in how we should conduct our forty days. Christ was tempted especially by the two things that caused creation to fall. The greatest temptations we as men and women could face. It would do us well to ponder the responses of Christ so as to further conform our wills to Him.

In this Lenten season, while we remember these of Christ’s temptations, let us make our lives like a desert in imitation of Him who brought our salvation.

Removing the Blindfold on Liberty

“Liberty, then, belongs only to those who have the gift of reason or intelligence. Considered as to its nature, it is the faculty of choosing means fitted for the end proposed, for he is master of his actions who can choose one thing out of many” -Pope Leo XIII Libertas

Credits

The Philosophy of Metaphysics seeks to bring understanding to the human condition as beings that are be-ing. As such, we go beyond the senses and physical attributes to human nature, the intellect, and the will.

Being, in both senses of the word, contains properties that we call the transcendentals. These properties exist within all beings and are integral to the thought. Every being contains these properties which are as follows:

  1. Unity
  2. Truth
  3. Goodness
  4. Beauty

Since these properties belong to every existence, we can say that; every being is one, every being is true, every being is good, and every being is beautiful.

The concept of freedom or liberty deals with the thoughts or actions of individuals and the ability to use/have them. Thus for the remainder of this article we will be focusing on two of the transcendentals that influence these; truth and goodness.

Truth of thought

As every being is true, there necessarily exists an obligation on that being to conform to that which IS true. Truth in relation to being deals principally with the intellect. The intellect exists outside of the mind, and gives us the power to know.

Truth is fundamentally the relation of the intellect to a thing, an existent. Our nominal idea of truth in the modern world is whatever we make it to be, “my truth” or “your truth.” But transcendental truth is all encompassing, it pertains to the objective order of things for it is the conforming of our thought to that which actually exists in reality; real Truth is always “our truth” it is the way things really are, not a warped denial of what is.

Coming to an understanding of (big T) Truth, brings us back to the notion of freedom/liberty. A being is only free in so far as it has the ability to seek and to know Truth. Once our intellect grasps that which is in reality, we must then conform ourselves to what is real and true, this is our obligation.

We cease being free when we deny this relation between our intellect and reality. When “our truth” is denied for “my truth” it is like placing a blindfold over the objectivity of reality and does not allow the knower to see what is then good and beautiful.

Goodness of action

Now that we understand that the intellect is the power that enables a being to know and that it is used to conform ourselves to reality, we move on to the will.

The will is that power that enables a being to act on what it knows. Thus it follows logically that since the will is a doing power and the intellect is a knowing power, we can say the will is blind without truth.

The less we know of Truth, that is, the more we deny “our truth” in favor of “my truth,” the less we will be able to do what is good.

It is understood that we, as rational beings, harbor free will. But our will is only free in as much as we can choose to do what we think is good (for who would choose what they know to be bad?). This stresses the importance of knowing Truth. Without knowing Truth we cannot know what is truly good to do and what is the privation of it, evil.

The will becomes less free the less Truth we know. Our freedom and liberty depend on not only conforming our minds to what is in reality but in doing what is right and good through our actions because of our knowledge of what is true.

The modern notion of freedom or liberty is better defined as individual autonomy; the ability to do or think whatever we so choose for no more reason than because we want to.

As we see though, real liberty is found in conforming our thoughts and actions with that which is objectively true and good. It is our obligation to seek the Truth and to do good because of the properties we have as rational beings.

We must remove the blindfold we place over ourselves and return to that which gives foundation to our thoughts and actions. For how could we ever hope to think and do what is true and good if we deny their very existence?